|
Your about as fake as my tits.
Post by Pamela on Jan 30, 2015 21:27:15 GMT
|
|
|
Some pictures? I mean all those quotes sure are impressive but I ain't believing shit till I see it with my own two eyes.
9/11 baby never forget.
Post by Can you give us on Jan 30, 2015 21:28:45 GMT
|
|
|
Kay so we gather here today for the Internet state of invasion and silliness' first meeting.
First order of business who shall be decided as our leader and what shall our first plan of attack be?
Post by /ISIS/ meeting on Jan 30, 2015 21:30:52 GMT
|
|
Drut
Administrator
Posts: 513
|
Soft tissue has been found in other fossils so which is it bro, does the soft tissue indicate fake or not? Looks like you're a two handed paleontologist there bro "on the one hand it could be fake, but on the other hand it might not" Where are the non dinosaur marine fossils with soft tissue? Are you trying to say things can't be revised as new discoveries are made? Why not go persecute Galileo then Mr Pope Galileo had data which fitted a different theory. That's how science works, you come up with a new theory, then create an experiment which generates data which can be used to evaluate the new theory (by comparing the measures of the data to the hypothesized values of said measure). It's not finding some hoax and making up a story to try to make that hoax seem plausible. When you guys grab 100 fossils of dinos and marine animals, remove all ways to distinguish them, then send them off to get tests for soft tissue, and find they both have soft tissue (instead of just the dino fakes) then you might be started to do what real scientists do.
Post by Drut on Jan 30, 2015 23:04:47 GMT
|
|
|
Are you trying to say things can't be revised as new discoveries are made? Why not go persecute Galileo then Mr Pope Galileo had data which fitted a different theory. That's how science works, you come up with a new theory, then create an experiment which generates data which can be used to evaluate the new theory (by comparing the measures of the data to the hypothesized values of said measure). It's not finding some hoax and making up a story to try to make that hoax seem plausible. When you guys grab 100 fossils of dinos and marine animals, remove all ways to distinguish them, then send them off to get tests for soft tissue, and find they both have soft tissue (instead of just the dino fakes) then you might be started to do what real scientists do. I don't even understand what you're talking about. You're confusing. Bring back the jokes.
Post by I want jokes on Jan 30, 2015 23:27:30 GMT
|
|
|
You haven't even pieced together a full argument let alone come up with concrete proof to any of your claims. Why should I believe you exactly?
Hoax of all time goes to you for trying to cover up how gay you are
Post by Ninja please on Jan 31, 2015 0:13:19 GMT
|
|
|
What you're saying is really upsetting me. I can't even imagine a world without it and you are being an ass hole ruining something i care very much about. You're like that asspie that bought all the rosalinas to keep them away from the fans all because you don't like it. Please stop you're giving me an ulcer. I worry about this everyday. I'd probably kill myself if it was proven false because I care so much. Please stop saying jenk isn't real I know it killed your Scientologist leader but it is still a real thing. Thank you sir. I would kindly ask you to cease posting here to stop any future instances of upsetting wrong information. Jenk has nothing against scientology. We forgave and forgot but it seems you still can't be a respectable group and stop this smear campaign.
Post by Stop it please :( on Jan 31, 2015 1:10:05 GMT
|
|
|
You're posting on throwaways? No one will ever believe/give a fuck what you say. Just give up now before you waste your time. Suicide is ALWAYS a plan B.
Post by You do realize on Jan 31, 2015 1:28:03 GMT
|
|
Drut
Administrator
Posts: 513
|
I agree, except it's not science ruining dinosaurs, but hoaxsters less concerned about making something look cool and more concerned about "proving" evolution.
Post by Drut on Jan 31, 2015 1:50:43 GMT
|
|
|
I agree, except it's not science ruining dinosaurs, but hoaxsters less concerned about making something look cool and more concerned about "proving" evolution. Say whhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa?
Post by Huh? on Jan 31, 2015 2:35:41 GMT
|
|
Drut
Administrator
Posts: 513
|
That's the problem the Freemasons had. in order to attract public attention the dinos had to be spectacularly large. But making them so large means they are impossible. There's reasons why elephants are as big as you can go for terrestrial mammals. The bigger it is the more food it needs and the greater the stresses on the bones.
Post by Drut on Jan 31, 2015 6:45:13 GMT
|
|
Drut
Administrator
Posts: 513
|
They often get "beyond reproach" kinds of spokesmen for their ideas, like the book "To Kill a Mockingbird" was probably written by Jews and they just got an old WASP lady to take credit for it. Wasn't Darwin a minister? That's why he got suckered with being the head of the evolution movement.
Post by Drut on Jan 31, 2015 7:17:19 GMT
|
|
Who are you talking to
Guest
|
Tubs
Post by Who are you talking to on Jan 31, 2015 11:20:24 GMT
|
|
|
You sound like one ugly, fat, autist with literally zero people skills.
Does your mom know you're this gay?
Post by Lol on Feb 2, 2015 6:52:38 GMT
|
|
|
Ass ram kitchen is a real person!!!
Post by Gill fisan on Feb 3, 2015 20:56:32 GMT
|
|
|
It's over stop everything.
For dinosaurs! For victory!
Post by WE did it!!! on Feb 5, 2015 20:16:11 GMT
|
|
Drut
Administrator
Posts: 513
|
The dino dudes say that the Griffin proves dinos are real. O rly? Maybe they just based a made up dino on a griffin. Here's the question: why didn't medieval people collect griffin skeletons? Is it because these fossils never existed? They are made up.
Post by Drut on Feb 6, 2015 8:16:09 GMT
|
|
|
The dino dudes say that the Griffin proves dinos are real. O rly? Maybe they just based a made up dino on a griffin. Here's the question: why didn't medieval people collect griffin skeletons? Is it because these fossils never existed? They are made up. No one's disputing Griffins are made up. Like did you see Harry Potter? They're just cgi! But nice joke anyways man. Classic material here man. Ps HahahaHAHAHAHAHAHahaHahaha
Post by Duh on Feb 6, 2015 15:44:58 GMT
|
|
|
Are you a cop?
Naw just kidding bro. But naw seriously do you actually believe this or are you just ebin trollin?
Post by Be real with me on Feb 6, 2015 18:52:19 GMT
|
|
Drut
Administrator
Posts: 513
|
Are you a cop? Naw just kidding bro. But naw seriously do you actually believe this or are you just ebin trollin? If you were smart enough to actually evaluate the evidence and arguments you'd have your answer.
Post by Drut on Feb 7, 2015 0:32:00 GMT
|
|
Drut
Administrator
Posts: 513
|
The dino dudes say that the Griffin proves dinos are real. O rly? Maybe they just based a made up dino on a griffin. Here's the question: why didn't medieval people collect griffin skeletons? Is it because these fossils never existed? They are made up. No one's disputing Griffins are made up. Like did you see Harry Potter? They're just cgi! But nice joke anyways man. Classic material here man. Ps HahahaHAHAHAHAHAHahaHahaha The dino dues say Griffins aren't made up - they were based on dino fossiles, they say.
Post by Drut on Feb 7, 2015 0:33:30 GMT
|
|
|
Are you a cop? Naw just kidding bro. But naw seriously do you actually believe this or are you just ebin trollin? If you were smart enough to actually evaluate the evidence and arguments you'd have your answer. Ah I see. Quite. You see there's just one problem with your idea... I'm pretty sure your the only ones that's read any of those links.
Post by Lawl on Feb 8, 2015 4:56:59 GMT
|
|
|
Your gay. Poopy
Post by Bored 12yo on Feb 10, 2015 6:13:02 GMT
|
|
|
If you were smart enough to actually evaluate the evidence and arguments you'd have your answer. Ah I see. Quite. You see there's just one problem with your idea... I'm pretty sure your the only ones that's read any of those links. Has the right idea. If you can't get someone to even read your argument without all your tl;dr bullshit you're probably wrong. But everyone already knows that ;P
Post by This guy... on Feb 10, 2015 6:20:14 GMT
|
|
Drut
Administrator
Posts: 513
|
Ah I see. Quite. You see there's just one problem with your idea... I'm pretty sure your the only ones that's read any of those links. Has the right idea. If you can't get someone to even read your argument without all your tl;dr bullshit you're probably wrong. But everyone already knows that ;P tldr: I'm too stupid and lazy to read therefore I am right
Post by Drut on Feb 10, 2015 10:35:06 GMT
|
|
|
Has the right idea. If you can't get someone to even read your argument without all your tl;dr bullshit you're probably wrong. But everyone already knows that ;P tldr: I'm too stupid and lazy to read therefore I am right I thought that's what you were making though? You mean this isn't a script for "How to be an Idiot"? I'll even help! I'm a terrific screen play writer. How's this for a tag line? If you're acting like an idiot online alone, does anyone even care? Pretty good huh?
Post by Yee on Feb 10, 2015 15:36:43 GMT
|
|
|
Has the right idea. If you can't get someone to even read your argument without all your tl;dr bullshit you're probably wrong. But everyone already knows that ;P tldr: I'm too stupid and lazy to read therefore I am right Naw it's not that I'm too lazy to read it's just hard to see straight when your jokes are so funny I start crying.
Post by Lawl on Feb 10, 2015 15:40:01 GMT
|
|
|
You at all.
You have 0 evidence
Post by I don't believe on Feb 10, 2015 15:41:03 GMT
|
|
|
I'd rather listen to 4chan posts read by some fat nigger than read this shit.
Fuck off
Post by Gay on Feb 10, 2015 15:42:31 GMT
|
|
|
Way to kick em in the dick
Post by Nice troll on Feb 10, 2015 15:43:51 GMT
|
|