Drut
Administrator
Posts: 513
|
Phil Schneider claims Mars has a blue sky and Nasa alters the images to give the red/orange hue. Is he right?
Or is the Mars Rover merely on earth roaming around a South American desert?
Post by Drut on Jan 17, 2015 11:37:21 GMT
|
|
Drut
Administrator
Posts: 513
|
^This is crap. But can you tell why? Post by Drut on Jan 19, 2015 7:23:17 GMT
|
|
|
|
There are no Aztec style sculptures on arizona me think =)
Post by anubis on Jan 25, 2015 7:40:04 GMT
|
|
Drut
Administrator
Posts: 513
|
There are no Aztec style sculptures on arizona me think =) Welcome to the forum dude. I'm not from the US so I really wouldn't know. I'm not convinced it's a statue, I think it could be a weird rock. There are two pics, Jim only analysed one. thethrowaways.freeforums.net/thread/19/jim-full-on-jpegsIf the rover pictures are a hoax, they could be done outside the United states. For example they tested the rover in the Atacama Desert in South America. Post by Drut on Jan 25, 2015 8:01:05 GMT
|
|
|
|
I watched those 2 vids with my friend (who is still kinda half-plugged into this 3D-Matrix) and he was like: " Ohh my dear God, IS THAT WATER ON THAT PLANET???" i told him if NASA has caught bullshitting us all the time, there would be no reason water not to exsist on Mars. What is your take on this admin?
Peace
Martin
Post by anubis on Jan 26, 2015 7:42:07 GMT
|
|
Drut
Administrator
Posts: 513
|
I watched those 2 vids with my friend (who is still kinda half-plugged into this 3D-Matrix) and he was like: " Ohh my dear God, IS THAT WATER ON THAT PLANET???" i told him if NASA has caught bullshitting us all the time, there would be no reason water not to exsist on Mars. What is your take on this admin? Peace Martin Okay so the videos are fake. There's no objective way to go from "dusty image" to "undusted" image. The artist of the pictures simply decided he wanted there to be water so he used blue values for the filter in those areas. How do I know? Because water moves, people would have noticed if the desert floor was changing in a sequence of photos. So it is disinformation. It does two different things for two different groups. For gullible people, it tells them what they want to hear. For skeptical people, it seems obviously false. For example, why is the dust so uniform on the camera lens? Why was it there since the beginning? Now why create this disinformation? It is to hide real information. So the real information is this, there is a guy named Phil Schnieder who claims to have the ORIGINAL photo from mars. No dust. This is the kind of photo he claims NASA makes look "dusty" by running it through some photo filters. The disinformation is designed to discredit this, because it seems so similar.  And how did Phil come to possess this image? He has the craziest story which is seems true in some ways, because comments he made for example about the original WTC attack being a nuke check out. His story is that there are underground bases the US shares with aliens for research. He was an engineer who helped design them (nukes used to form craters). You can watch some of his stuff here: This article is good: www.veteranstoday.com/2012/06/14/the-strange-case-of-phil-schneider/Post by Drut on Jan 26, 2015 8:56:18 GMT
|
|
